♦ My anti-feminist rant continues, huzzah! For the first part of this see Why Women Disgust Me – Part 1

So, this is the first debate about the points I moaned about from the Ann Summers party. Me and a couple of people who I shall name Bint and One Post, just for kicks :P

Bint said she’d rather continue being a feminist as she wanted gender equality. Not just for women, but for men as well.

Bint: There are guys around that believe women like being roughly-handled and have no feelings in our boobs or nether regions. A single experience with that kind of guy is sufficient to convince you of the ‘vibrators Vs men’ statement being true. You’ll probably come back with “why not just re-educate him?” to which I’ll just shrug and tell you that some guys just don’t wanna listen I guess.

Blacksilk: Odd. I rather like gender equality as well. Which is exactly why I hate feminism. Anyway, I really *do* like being handled roughly. Of course, not so much that I’ll exclude everything else, but I like it.

I’ve had encounters with a couple of men who were like that, but I didn’t even consider thinking the ridiculously ill thought-out notion that this instantly means that men are inferior to vibrators. If nothing else that idea ignores all the extra bits, besides sex, that a relationship brings. Sex is not everything. And even if it were I’d always take a real actual man over a bit of silicon and a motor.

Whether there are guys who are crap in the sack or not, and I’m sure there are just as I’m certain there are women who’d get nil points, to generalise that “you can do infinitely better on your own” is not just simple-minded but incredibly offensive. It sets back how men are viewed, and indeed how women are viewed, by a large amount.

Can it make a decent cup of tea?

Can it make a decent cup of tea though?

Bint: Mind you, the few men that I’ve had experience with were brief flings and so there was no real point trying with them. I just moved on and I got over it. Personally I’m not keen on sex toys as they seem like too much hassle for so little.

Anyway, the key reason I’d say I’m a feminist is because “feminism is not grounded in the basis of one’s gender, but in rejecting and refuting sexist oppression politically, socially, privately, linguistically, and otherwise.” (Blacksilk: I’d like to point out that this quote comes from Wikipedia. Truly a woman who knows where to get her facts from.)

Blacksilk: If feminism isn’t on the basis of one’s gender then why call it feminism? Why not call it egalitarianism or something like that? Anti-sexism, I-want-everyone-to-just-shut-up-and-be-equal-ism, whatever, but when you bring gender into the name that’s not a good sign.

Feminism is based on women. And it isn’t, on the whole, an equality movement. Feminists do not endorse, with equality, men’s rights. Feminism is, in fact, extremely sexist. And not just sexist to men, but even to women. Personally I think that much of feminism is more about women being ’special’ than equal.

At this point it seems that Bint gave up and went home or something. Either way she didn’t have anything to reply to this. What worries me is that she mentioned she has a man. And a kid. I worry, really I do.

At this point some wandering passer-by seemingly decided to add their single comment.

One Shot: It’s incredible that there are any kids being born, when there’s so much man-hating. Not even the harshest dictators hate HALF the population, as these feminazis do. Let them live on their separate island in grass huts, free from the civilization ‘the patriarchy’ built for them. They can pleasure themselves all night, and claw at each other all day. We can definitely do without them.

Seemed like a decent sort, tee hee :P    Anyway….

Tune in next time for the third part of this little anti-feminist, Ann Summers-related tirade where we shall see the debate between yours truly, dear Fractal and the mighty ‘Femme’! ♦